Legal Opinion
Claim of Lehsten v. NACM-Upstate New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
This appeal concerns the interpretation of several sections of the Workers’ Compensation Law and its administrative review procedures. A three-member panel of the Workers’ Compensation Board unanimously affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) allowing compensation benefits to the claimant. During the pendency of the panel’s review, the employer’s obligation to pay the award was statutorily stayed by operation of Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (3) (f). The issue before us is whether an employer, by filing for discretionary full…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Dukes v. Capitol Formation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Roscoe v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of D'Errico v. New York City Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Romano v. New York City Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of Szymanski v. ABA Tech Indus., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Negron v. Sky View Haven Nursing Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Iannelli v. Lumelite Plastics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.