Legal Opinion

Iannelli v. Lumelite Plastics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 28, 1998, which ruled that claimant was to receive payments at a tentative rate pending further development of the record.

After the record in this controverted claim for workers’ *508compensation benefits was complete, the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) filed a decision on December 10, 1997, finding “accident, notice and causal relationship for an injury to claimant’s back arising out of and in the course of his employment, with a date of accident of [December 2, 1996],” and continued the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Lehsten v. NACM-Upstate New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Soper v. Gouverneur Talc Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Claim of Smith v. Community Resource CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Nickens v. RandstadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API