Legal Opinion
Claim of Romano v. New York City Department of Corrections
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 3, 2000, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant’s case was properly adjourned for further testimony, (2) from a decision of said Board, filed November 13, 2000, which ruled that claimant did not require home health care services, and (3) from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge, filed July 23, 2001, which ruled that all issues had been resolved on prior findings and awards.
Claimant was declared totally permanently disabled as the result of a 1978 work-related back injury. As relevant herein, claimant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Pistone v. Sam's ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Lehsten v. NACM-Upstate New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Mitchell v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Chadha v. J.B. Lippincott Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Long v. Overhead Door Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Harris v. Phoenix Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of Alamin v. Down Town Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Claim of Nomikos v. Ionic Painting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of McHugh v. Daily FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009