Legal Opinion
United States v. Burgum
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 2011No. 09-50449PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FISHER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Joseph Case Burgum appeals the district court’s imposition of a 180-month sentence of imprisonment following his guilty plea to two counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. Burgum contends that the district court improperly used the statutory maximum instead of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range as a starting point for sentencing and improperly treated his inability to pay restitution as an aggravating factor. He also argues that the sentence imposed was substantively unreasonable.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Gonzalez-AparicioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Henry AnekwuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Collins ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Juan RangelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. James JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.