Legal Opinion

People v. Pierson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1957No. Crim. 3257PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant was charged with incest, statutory rape, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The last count was later dismissed by stipulation. The jury acquitted the defendant on the rape charge and convicted him on the incest charge. From the judgment entered on the verdict, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, the defendant appeals.

There were several prior trials resulting in jury disagreements. On the present appeal Pierson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, challenges one instruction, contends that the prosecuting attorney was guilty of prejudicial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. GodlewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. NewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People v. KlinkenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cody v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Ruester v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. People v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. State v. FromkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. WilkesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API