Legal Opinion

People v. Wilkes

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1960No. Crim. 6775PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of three counts of violation of section 274 1 of the Penal Code (abortion). He has appealed from the judgment.

It was initially alleged that defendant violated Penal Code, sections 274 and 664 (attempted abortion), by supplying and administering a “vaginal pack” to one Hilda Mary Muise. The district attorney made a motion to amend the information by interlineation by substituting the words “a substance” in place of “vaginal pack.” The motion was denied. The district attorney then moved to dismiss. This motion was granted November 12, 1958.

A new information was filed on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. HawesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. BergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. FaulknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. PoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. PoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API