Legal Opinion
Banks v. Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 17, 2009No. A09A2128PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
James Gregory Banks and his wife, Donna (collectively, “Banks”), appeal the grant of summary judgment to Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (“Brotherhood”) in this declaratory judgment action. Because the trial court correctly determined that Brotherhood was not obligated to pay uninsured motorist (“UM”) benefits to Banks, we affirm.
To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- United States Fire Insurance v. Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. StatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Progressive Preferred Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Gilbert v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taylor Morrison Services, Inc. v. HDI-Gerling America InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Infinity General Insurance Co. v. LittonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Langdale Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- LUCAS v. BECKMAN COULTER, INC. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Lucas v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.