Legal Opinion
Glen Eugene Crow v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1963No. 17327PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Crow has appealed from the order of the district court denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. The trial court permitted notice of appeal to be filed but denied appellant the right to proceed further in forma pauperis on the ground that his appeal was frivolous. Upon application, this court permitted appellant to pursue his appeal in forma pauperis. Crow v. United States, 8 Cir., 316 F.2d 207. We appointed Eugene P. Mitchell of the Kansas City Bar as attorney for the appellant. We express our thanks to Mr. Mitchell for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Philip A. Foley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- United States Ex Rel. Demarois v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Nolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judson Lee DraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Norbert D. Terlikowski v. United States of America, James Slawek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Irving NapueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Lalla v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.