Schultz v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Respondent Joseph Schultz’s driving privileges were revoked after he failed a breath test. At the implied consent hearing the trial court rescinded the revocation, determining that the Commissioner of Public Safety failed to establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that Schultz’s alcohol concentration was .10 or more, as required by Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984). The Commissioner appeals, and we affirm.
FACTS
On February 6, 1986, at approximately 11:45 p.m., Officer David Nelson stopped Schultz for erratic driving. He observed indicia of alcohol consumption and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State, Department of Public Safety v. HabischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Zern v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kramer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005