Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1986No. C1-86-800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Respondent Joseph Schultz’s driving privileges were revoked after he failed a breath test. At the implied consent hearing the trial court rescinded the revocation, determining that the Commissioner of Public Safety failed to establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that Schultz’s alcohol concentration was .10 or more, as required by Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984). The Commissioner appeals, and we affirm.

FACTS

On February 6, 1986, at approximately 11:45 p.m., Officer David Nelson stopped Schultz for erratic driving. He observed indicia of alcohol consumption and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State, Department of Public Safety v. HabischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Zern v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kramer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API