Legal Opinion
Bellamy v. Wells
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 29, 2008No. Civil Action 5:07cv00035PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAMUEL G. WILSON, District Judge.
This is an action by pro se plaintiff Engram M. Bellamy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights against three City of Waynesboro, Virginia police officers, Alyssa C. Wells, Brent Uzdanovics, and Doug Davis for initiating and surreptitiously recording conversations with him while he was in custody on an indictment for rape. Bellamy also brings a false imprisonment claim under § 1983. The matter is now before this court on: (1) Davis’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that he was not employed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bellamy v. WellsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
- Williams v. Jacksonville Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021