Legal Opinion

Bellamy v. Wells

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 15, 2009No. Civil Action 5:07cv00035Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILSON, District Judge.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Plaintiff Engram M. Bellamy alleges that Defendants Alyssa Campbell Wells and Brent Uzdanovics, two City of Waynesboro police officers, violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights because they questioned him post-indictment outside his counsel’s presence, without giving proper warnings or obtaining a waiver of his rights. Bellamy’s statements were used against him at trial, and his resulting conviction was reversed on appeal because the Court of Appeals of Virginia found that the officers violated Bellamy’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API