Legal Opinion

Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 2014No. H038027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIKLARA, J.

Appellants Robert Martin and Ronald Sphar were reinstated to their employment with appellant, California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), by respondent State Personnel Board (the Board) after they successfully challenged their dismissals. The Board awarded Martin and Sphar backpay and benefits under Government Code section 19584, 1 including merit salary adjustments and physical fitness incentive pay (PFIP), and offset that award with the amount of money they had earned from other employers, not including overtime pay, during the four-year period…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barber v. Cal. State Pers. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Barber v. CA State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. DeNike v. Mathew Enterprise, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Superior Court v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API