Legal Opinion

State v. Ekberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1929No. 27,520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant, indicted in Hennepin county for bribery, was found guilty and appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He was an alderman in the city of Minneapolis. The indictment was lengthy and complete in its allegations. For our purpose here it is sufficient to state that it charged that the defendant did ask, agree to receive, and receive as a bribe from H. L. Schaefer $600 upon the agreement and understanding that defendant’s vote, opinion and action would be influenced in that he would vote in the city council in favor of accepting the bid of the Twin City Motor Car…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. State v. Lopes, Sr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. State v. OstensoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API