Legal Opinion

Egan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 5, 1923No. 3868PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellant, defendant below, a law clerk in the Bureau of Internal Revenue, was indicted under sections 113 and 117 of the United States Penal Code (Comp. St. §§ 10283, 10287). Section 113 provides that:

“Whoever, * * * being the head of a department, or other officer or clerk in the employ of the United States, shall, directly or indirectly, receive, or agree to> receive, any compensation whatever for any services rendered or to be rendered to any person, either by himself or another, in relation to any proceeding, contract, claim, controversy, charge, accusation,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  5. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API