United States v. Manuel Ruiz-Alvarez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
The defendant was convicted of several charges and received a sentence totaling 360 months. In a previous appeal, one conviction was reversed, the others affirmed. The question posed now is whether the district court had the authority to resentence the defendant anew on the affirmed counts even though the appellate decision did not specifically remand the case for resentencing. We hold that when the previous panel vacated the conviction on one count and affirmed the convictions on the remaining counts, Ruiz-Alvarez’s sentencing package became “unbundled,” jurisdiction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Vincent Franklin BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Bryson Jose Roberto A. MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Dean LafromboiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. DossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.