Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean Lafromboise

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 2005No. 03-35853PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge.

Dean LaFromboise appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for habe-as relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. LaF-romboise challenges his conviction and sentence on several grounds, including ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, misjoinder of charges, and improper application of the sentencing guidelines. The district court did not reach the merits of LaFromboise’s collateral attack, and instead denied the motion as untimely under the one-year statute of limitations established by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Van AlstyneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Burrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of SkylstadWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API