Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DeBaldo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeals, 27 and 26PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Baldwin Township, a township of the first class, pursuant to the Act of June 29, 1923, P. L. 957, 53 PS §15731, its supplements and amendments, adopted a zoning ordinance 1 which provides by section 6 sub section 24 that “mining operations of all kinds, -except for water” is a “prohibited use” of land located within a township district designated as “Commercial”.

Two informations were filed against each of the appellants charging them with violations of the ordinance “by mining coal in an area prohibited by said ordinance, particularly Section 6 Sub-section 24.” One set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. GinsbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Pittsburgh v. RuffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. SpalloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. BELOFFSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Knup v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. ClairtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Vogt v. Port Vue BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API