Legal Opinion
Osment v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 17, 2002No. A02A1276PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
A jury found James Edward Osment guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. Osment appeals. Osment contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because he was seized and detained without probable cause; that his detention exceeded the scope allowed by Terry v. Ohio; 1 and that because of the unlawful detention, the subsequent search of his bag was also unlawful. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm.
A trial court’s order on a motion to suppress will not be disturbed if there is any evidence to support it. 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gilreath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- The State v. Walker.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- State v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.