Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2003No. A03A0669, A03A0673PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to the grant of an interlocutory appeal, Patrice Smith and Alfred Eugene Caldwell appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress. Both Smith and Caldwell were charged with theft by receiving and theft by taking of two computer monitors and two computer keyboards, as well as possession of cocaine and less than an ounce of marijuana. Caldwell also was charged with pos*615session of a firearm by a convicted felon and use of a firearm during the commission of a felony.

In considering an appeal from denial of a motion to suppress, this Court…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Wilson v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wesson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Fitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API