Legal Opinion

Boozer v. Boozer

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 10, 1988No. 1447PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant John W. Boozer sued his wife, respondent Ruth Boozer, for personal injuries allegedly suffered in an auto mobile accident. Mr. Boozer testified that his injuries resulted in medical bills totaling in excess of $2,000. The jury returned a verdict against Mrs. Boozer in the amount of $748.29. Mr. Boozer moved for a new trial or, in the alternative, a new trial nisi additur on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The trial judge denied his motions. We affirm.

The single issue presented on appeal is whether the trial judge erred “in refusing to grant an additur to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Toole v. TooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. Peay v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Collins Ex Rel. Collins v. Bisson Moving & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Krepps Ex Rel. Krepps v. AusenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API