Legal Opinion

Peay v. Ross

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1987No. 0965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

James N. Peay commenced this action in trespass for damages against Roger L. Ross and G & R Enterprises, Inc. The jury returned a. verdict for Peay in the sum of $10,000.00 actual damages. Ross and G & R Enterprises appeal from the judge’s denial of their motion for a new trial nisi or, in the alternative, for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was excessive. We affirm.

The granting or refusing of a new trial absolute or a new trial nisi for excessiveness of verdict is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial judge. Bowden v. Powell, 194 S. C. 482,10 S. E. (2d) 8…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mishoe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Mylin v. Allen-White Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. De Shields v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boozer v. BoozerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. McEntire v. Mooregard Exterminating Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Soaper v. Hope Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API