Peay v. Ross
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge:
James N. Peay commenced this action in trespass for damages against Roger L. Ross and G & R Enterprises, Inc. The jury returned a. verdict for Peay in the sum of $10,000.00 actual damages. Ross and G & R Enterprises appeal from the judge’s denial of their motion for a new trial nisi or, in the alternative, for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was excessive. We affirm.
The granting or refusing of a new trial absolute or a new trial nisi for excessiveness of verdict is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial judge. Bowden v. Powell, 194 S. C. 482,10 S. E. (2d) 8…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mishoe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Mylin v. Allen-White Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- De Shields v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boozer v. BoozerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- McEntire v. Mooregard Exterminating Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Soaper v. Hope Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992