Legal Opinion

Gillett v. Gillett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Bill to annul a marriage claimed to be voidable for fraud. Defendant appeals from decree granting relief prayed.' The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The bill in this case was filed to set aside a marriage claimed to be voidable for fraud. It appears to our satisfaction, as it did to the court below, that complainant, who was a man of about 75, and who had lost his eye-sight, and was more or less deaf, and otherwise broken, was induced suddenly, and by putting him under the influence of liquors, and probably of drugs, to marry defendant, who was less than half his age, and had a young child, and for whom he had never entertained any attachment, and with whom he was very slightly acquainted. He had just become assured that he would receive…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henneger v. LomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Romatz v. RomatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Husted v. HustedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Price v. PriceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API