Legal Opinion

Nizza v. Adams

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 17, 1978No. 78-027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The first issue is whether at a de novo hearing pursuant to RSA 282:5 G(3) the trial court may deny a claimant unemployment benefits for “voluntarily leaving employment without good cause” when the department had not raised that reason for disqualification in any of the prior proceedings. We hold that it may not. The second issue is whether both of the appeal tribunal’s reasons for disqualification were .reversed by the findings of the trial court. We hold that they were.

The plaintiff worked as a hearing aid salesman for defendant Leo F. Seelig, d/b/a Beltone Hearing Aid Service from February…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Pregent v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. Fleury v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Cushing v. ThomsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles & Nancy, Inc. v. ZessinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Appeal of Fournier v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API