Legal Opinion

Charles & Nancy, Inc. v. Zessin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 18, 1978No. 78-019PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether a superior court may deny workmen’s compensation benefits for a reason that was not raised in the formal hearing before the labor commissioner. In June 1974 Andrew Zessin suffered pains in the left hip and buttock in the course of his employment with Charles & Nancy, Inc. Zessin consulted Doctors Howard Lightfoot and Preston Clark concerning the pains. Both doctors ordered x-rays, certain bills for which were mailed to Charles & Nancy, Inc., in March 1975. The employer referred the matter to its insurer, which refused payment on the grounds that Zessin’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. Nizza v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burnham v. DowningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Murphy v. Town of AtkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Bothwick v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. City of Rochester v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Hamel Real Estate, Inc. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API