Legal Opinion

Troensegaard v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1985No. A028937PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

Plaintiff Gertrude Troensegaard, on September 19, 1983, commenced an action against Silvercrest Industries, Inc. (Silver-*221crest), and others, for damages for personal injuries based on breach of express warranty, products liability, and fraudulent concealment. Compensatory, punitive, and a “civil penalty” of, damages were sought. The subject of the action was a mobilehome, claimed to have exuded unacceptable formaldehyde fumes, which was manufactured by Silvercrest and sold to plaintiff. The action was compromised and settled before trial for a total of $6,000 as to certain…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Brady v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  2. Romo v. FFG InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
  3. Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API