Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Connolly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1970No. Appeal, 677PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

In the course of his trial for blackmail, appellant took the stand to testify in his own defense. For the purpose of impeaching his credibility, the Commonwealth proved that appellant had once been convicted of robbery by calling a clerk of court, who indicated that appellant had pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with robbery.

Following this testimony, the following events occurred, as related in the opinion of the court below: “At this juncture in the trial, the Commonwealth called the Honorable Vincent A. Carroll to the witness stand for the purpose of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuarantaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Howard v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Joachim v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. StrubeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. State v. GrimesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API