Joachim v. Chambers
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HECHT, Justice.
The issue for us in this original mandamus proceeding is whether a retired district judge who continues to serve as a judicial officer by assignment may testify as an expert witness.1 In the circumstances of this case we hold that he cannot.
I
Relators are plaintiffs in a legal malpractice action pending before respondent in the 215th District Court in Harris County.2 Defendants in that action represented rela-tors in a prior lawsuit in the 11th District Court of Harris County. Relators contend in the pending action that defendants mishandled the settlement of the prior…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Ayres v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Ludlow v. DeBerry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Gebhardt v. Gallardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.