Legal Opinion

Joachim v. Chambers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1991No. C-9115PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

The issue for us in this original mandamus proceeding is whether a retired district judge who continues to serve as a judicial officer by assignment may testify as an expert witness.1 In the circumstances of this case we hold that he cannot.

I

Relators are plaintiffs in a legal malpractice action pending before respondent in the 215th District Court in Harris County.2 Defendants in that action represented rela-tors in a prior lawsuit in the 11th District Court of Harris County. Relators contend in the pending action that defendants mishandled the settlement of the prior…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Ayres v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. RosenbaumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ludlow v. DeBerry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Gebhardt v. Gallardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  5. Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API