Commonwealth v. Steinberg
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The defendant was charged with “blackmail or extortion” in violation of §801 of the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS §4801. He was found guilty of the charge and. was sentencéd. It is conceded, as it must be, that the evidence clearly convicted him of the offense. In this appeal the defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because of the admission of testimony, to his prejudice, of matters entirely collateral to the issue of his guilt.
Defendant was a detective in the Police Department of Philadelphia. On September 26, 1953 he called one Albert Ostroff, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth v. KetteringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. GittelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TowberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. ConnollySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. McGuireSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. StakleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Snedaker & Co. v. Wayne Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.