Legal Opinion

LaForgia v. Kolsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1987No. D005590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

—The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of respondents (hereafter LaForgia or the LaForgia group) after finding they were entitled to a deficiency judgment against appellants (hereafter Kolsky or the Kolsky group) for the balance due on a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust on real property sold to a senior lienholder at a private foreclosure sale. We reverse and direct the trial court to enter summary judgment for Kolsky. The property had been in bankruptcy, then had been removed from bankruptcy and sold to Kolsky, and then later…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People Ex Rel. Riles v. Windsor Univ., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palm v. SchillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Ziegler v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Costanzo v. GangulyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Union Bank v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API