Legal Opinion
Costanzo v. Ganguly
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1993No. A054905PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, Acting P. J.
Appellants in this action, the former owners of a 44-unit apartment complex, appeal from a judgment awarding respondent Delta Costanzo the balance due on 11 promissory notes appellants had issued. Appellants claim respondent was barred from recovering a judgment against them by the antideficiency provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 580b. We agree and will reverse the decision of the trial court.
Facts and Procedural Background
In 1977 respondent acquired a 44-unit apartment complex located in Union City, consisting of 11 buildings containing 4 units each. At…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Kistler v. VasiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Jackson v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conley v. MatthesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Dmc, Inc. v. Downey Savings and Loan Assoc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Berk v. Aurora Loan Services CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Ward CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Robert S. Brower, Sr. - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.