Legal Opinion

Wilkerson v. Duke University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 2013No. COA13-181PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where there were issues of material fact with respect to plaintiffs claims for false imprisonment, assault, battery, and negligent supervision and retention, the portion of the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants as to those claims is reversed. Where there was no evidence of severe emotional distress, the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress is affirmed. Where plaintiff has an adequate remedy in state law, the trial court properly granted summary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Adams v. The City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Doe v. Diocese RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Head v. Adams Farm Living, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. Brown v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Randleman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API