Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Alvarado

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 10, 1988No. 01-86-00017-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

WARREN, Justice.

On rehearing, we withdraw our previous opinion on remand and substitute the following opinion.

In our original opinion, Bolton v. Alvarado, 714 S.W.2d 119 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1986), rev’d, 749 S.W.2d 47 (Tex. 1988) (op. on reh’g), we held that in the absence of a finding of fraud or mistake, the doctrine of merger precluded the purchasers of land from recovering on their suit for the breach of an earnest money contract. The Supreme Court of Texas, in Alvarado v. Bolton, 749 S.W.2d 47, reversed our decision, holding that the doctrine of merger may not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarado v. BoltonTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ridco, Inc. v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Chrysler-Plymouth City, Inc. v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. GeffertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Doerfler v. Espensen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hines v. HashTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hines v. HashTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Leggett v. Brinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  4. Leggett v. Brinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API