Hines v. Hash
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
843 S.W.2d 464 (1992)
Dutch HINES, Petitioner,
v.
C.W. HASH, Jr., Respondent.
No. D-0571.
Supreme Court of Texas.
December 9, 1992.
Rehearing Overruled January 27, 1993.
Rush S. Wells, William F. Warnick, Lubbock, for petitioner.
Tom J. Brian, Crosbyton, Ralph H. Brock, Lubbock, for respondent.
OPINION
HECHT, Justice.
The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act provides that "[a]s a prerequisite to filing a suit seeking damages" under the Act, "a consumer shall give written notice" to the defendant of his complaint. Tex.Btjs. 17.-505(a). We granted writ of error in this case to consider…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Doggett; Concurrence · Gammage.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Cail v. Service Motors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Weirich v. WeirichTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Delaney v. University of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Schepps v. Presbyterian Hospital of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.