State v. Moran
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
We are faced here with a conflict between an accused person’s right to be represented by the attorney of his choice at a criminal trial charging him with felonious misconduct and a trial justice’s need for ample discretion in managing the trial process to a just conclusion without tolerating unnecessary delays. In this case, the defendant’s selected trial lawyer was unavailable to begin the trial at the appointed hour because he was then in the middle of trying another case in a different jurisdiction. Accordingly, we must decide whether, in these circumstances, a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Andrew F. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Hilario Mendoza-Salgado, United States of America v. Ramon Edwardo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Earl Edward Gandy v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Priscilla Dominguez LauraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Bustamante v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- State v. SnellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.