Legal Opinion

State v. Snell

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 27, 2006No. 2003-219-C.APublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SUTTELL,

for the Court.

Although not expressly articulated in the Constitution, “the presumption of innocence” is a fundamental principle of our criminal jurisprudence, and a “basic component of a fair trial under our system of criminal justice.” Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 503, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976). This appeal calls into question the prejudicial effect that a jury’s knowledge of a defendant’s incarceration may have on the presumption of innocence. Specifically, the defendant, Curley Snell, argues that the trial justice erred in compelling him to stand…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BidoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. State v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. State v. Charles MitchellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. State v. Kendall WhitakerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API