Main & Winchester v. Messner
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This is an action to recover money on account for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant. To settle the question in controversy on demurrer, the defendant alleged in his answer that the plaintiffs were citizens of the state of California, and then set up as a defense in bar of the action his discharge under the insolvent laws of this state. It is admitted that the plaintiffs did not appear, nor were parties to the insolvency proceedings in any manner or form by which they have estopped themselves from denying the validity of such proceedings. The only question raised is,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baldwin v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- United States v. CoombsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Poe v. DuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Bedell & Warden v. ScrutonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882
- Donnelly v. . CorbettNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weber v. YancyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- National Bank v. FurtickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1897