Legal Opinion

Stein v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1935No. Appeal, 296PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff, Jennie. Stein, brought this action as beneficiary of a policy of insurance issued by defendant upon the life of her daughter, Kate Stein. The defense pleaded was that insured had made false and fraudulent answers to questions in her “answers to the medical examiner,” which formed a part of the application, a copy of which was attached to the policy. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, upon which the tidal court entered judgment. After the affirmance of that judgment by the Superior Court (116 Pa. Superior Ct. 109), we allowed an appeal.

The answers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Rinker v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Skruch v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Kuhns v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Indovina v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Soltaniuk v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Osche v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Kasmer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API