Kasmer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This action in assumpsit to recover the face amount of a life insurance policy was tried before three juries and each time the jury disagreed and was discharged. After the third trial defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the disagreement of the jury and after argument the motion was overruled. It appears to be now settled by the case of Conley v. Mervis, 324 Pa. 577, 188 A. 350, that in the circumstances present here an appeal lies from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment after disagreement under the Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70 (12 PS §684). Such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Conley v. MervisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Rinker v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Derrick v. Harwood Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Derr v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- DeWaele v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Theros v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- Anastasio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Phillips v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.