Legal Opinion

State v. . Fesperman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from StaNLy Superior Court, Fall Term, 1890, Bynum, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The indictment charges an assault “ with a certain deadly weapon, to-wit, a shovel of the weight of five pounds.” The special verdict finds that, in fact, the assault •was made by the defendant with his fist and within six months before the true'bill was found. It has been repeatedly held that when the indictment in the Superior Court charges an assault with a deadly weapon, the Court retains jurisdiction although in the proof simple assault only shall be shown. State v. Ray, 89 N. C., 587; State v. Reaves, 85 N. C., 553; State v. Cunningham, 94 N. C., 824; State v. Earnest, 98 N.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. State v. . PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. State v. . ReavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. State v. Shine.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. State v. Fritz.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API