State v. . Holder
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Ooolce, J., at the July Term, 1910, of "Waxe. The facts are sufficiently stated .in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
The defendants were indicted for throwing stones at a train, under Rev., 3763. Motion was made to quash the bill because the offense charged was not a joint one, and each defendant was entitled to a separate trial. The court, in its discretion, overruled the motion. This was a matter clearly within its sound discretion and will not be reviewed by this Court except in cases of gross abuse. S. v. Carrawan, 142 N. C., 575; S. v. Barrett, ib, 565; S. v. Moore, 120 N. C., 570; S. v. Finley, 118 N. C., 1161; S. v. Oxendine, 107 N. C., 783; S. v. Gooch, 94 N. C., 987; S. v. Underwood, 77 N. C., 502;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State v. FinleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State v. . UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.