Legal Opinion
Blair v. Armontrout
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 8, 1985No. 85-0155-CV-W-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is Petitioner Walter Blair’s motion to disqualify the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Missouri from representing the Respondents in this federal habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Blair challenges the constitutionality of his conviction on capital murder and subsequently imposed death sentence. Blair contends that disqualification is required by virtue of the fact that his former attorney who rep resented Petitioner in connection with his state post-conviction remedies is now employed as an Assistant Attorney…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington County Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- State v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walter J. Blair v. Bill Armontrout, Walter J. Blair v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Humphrey on Behalf of State v. McLarenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Johnson v. SchmidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bullock v. CarverDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Walter J. Blair v. Bill Armontrout, Walter J. Blair v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990