Legal Opinion

Humphrey on Behalf of State v. McLaren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1987No. C4-86-1150PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

The trial court denied defendant’s motion to disqualify the entire legal staff of the attorney general’s office as counsel for plaintiff in this case. The court of appeals granted defendant’s petition for discretionary review and certified the matter to us for accelerated consideration. We affirm the trial court.

Attorney General Humphrey, as the named plaintiff and on behalf of the State of Minnesota and the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERA), brings this lawsuit against defendant C. Michael McLaren, former executive director of PERA. 1 Plaintiffs complaint seeks…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  2. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State of Arkansas, Cross-Appellant v. Dean Foods Products Company, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. In Re Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability Litigation. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. John C. RisjordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Head v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Fognani v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API