Legal Opinion

Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2000No. 9706-04753; CA A100968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant Lincoln Loan Company appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s allowance of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their claims for declaratory relief and to the court’s related award of attorney fees. The trial court concluded that the maximum prepayment restriction of the parties’ land sale contract was unenforceable as violating ORS 82.170 and that, alternatively, the combination of that prepayment restriction and the contract’s restrictions on assignment violated public policy as effecting an impermissible restraint on the alienability of real property. We conclude that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bedortha v. Sunridge Land Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. StallcupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API