Legal Opinion

Bedortha v. Sunridge Land Co., Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. CC 86-CV-0377-WE; CA A49339; SC S36322PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether a vendor’s right to receive payments under an executory land sale contract is a separate personal property interest of the vendor or whether that interest is part of the vendor’s real property interest and, therefore, subject to a judgment lien. The Court of Appeals held that the right to receive contract payments — unless properly severed — is a part of the vendor’s real property interest. Bedortha v. Sunridge Land Co., Inc., 97 Or App 90, 775 P2d 872 (1989). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

We take the facts from the Court of Appeals’ opinion:

“…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. May v. EmersonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Security Bank v. ChiapuzioOregon Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burke v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. James v. ReconTrust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. In re: Michael W. Endresen and Joanne Maureen EndresenUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Ochs v. AlbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Cassidy v. PAVLONNISCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API