Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Fontes

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1945No. Civ. 12843PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

After hearing evidence introduced in a proceeding supplemental to execution, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a receiver; and from the order made in that behalf defendant has appealed.

The judgment in the action called for the payment of the sum of $3,168.75 and costs, found to be due on a promissory note. Execution issued and was returned wholly unsatisfied; whereupon plaintiff filed an affidavit setting forth the facts relating to the entry of the judgment, the issuance of the execution, the return thereof wholly unsatisfied, and averring on information and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Habenicht v. LissakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McCutcheon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Hathaway v. BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Morand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Zimmermann v. Southern California Bank (In Re Hilde)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Belote v. BakkenMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Olsan v. ComoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API