Hathaway v. Brady
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.
Hathaway sued Brady and attached certain personal and real property. For the purpose of releasing the personal property, Brady gave an undertaking, and deposited with Edmondson, the Sheriff, five thousand dollars in gold coin, and the personal property was thereupon released from the attachment. After judgment, and pending an appeal, Edmondson’s term of office being about to expire, an arrangement was made by the parties interested, through their attorneys, that the five thousand dollars in gold coin should be withdrawn from the custody of Edmondson and placed in the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Coffee v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- McCutcheon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.