Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Toetly

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1969No. 10255PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Mr. and Mrs. Henry Rosenberg, the respondents herein, instituted this action against Mr. Carl Toetly, the appellant, to recover damages they sustained in an an tomobile accident allegedly caused by Mr. Toetly’s negligent operation of his automobile. Following a jury trial which resulted in a verdict for Mr. Toetly, the Rosenbergs moved for a new trial, which motion was granted. Mr. Toetly has appealed from the order granting a new trial.

On the evening of August 28, 1966, the respondents and Mrs. Richard Renner were returning to Lewiston, Idaho from an outing in Coeur…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Lundy v. HazenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bale v. PerrymanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Sanchotena v. Tower Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Curtis v. FirthIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API