Legal Opinion
Grigsby v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Grigsby)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 9, 1990No. 15-18978PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The instant proceeding has been instituted by RUBY GRIGSBY, the Debtor (“the Debtor”), on behalf of herself and EDWARD SPARKMAN, ESQUIRE, the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee (“the Trustee”), against THORP CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO. d/b/a ITT FINANCIAL SERVICES (“ITT”), an obligee on a mortgage loan contract with the Debtor which the Debtor apparently believes may file a proof of claim against her in her individual Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. The Debtor seeks a determination that she has a right to rescind the loan contract as a result of two…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Smith v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Inge v. Rock Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Scott Brannam and Janet Brannam, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Huntington Mortgage Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Bell v. Parkway Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Bell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Grigsby v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Grigsby)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Madera v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Madera)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.