Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Defendant is the lessee of an oil station in the city of Milwaukee. As a part of the service equipment, defendant maintains two wash-rooms, one for women and the other for men. Two detectives of the Milwaukee police department entered the station on December 19, 1933, and asked permission to use the men’s wash-room. One of the officers found attached to the wall of the wash-room a slot-machine. He inserted ten cents in this slot-machine and received a cartridge containing a rubber article, commonly used for contraceptive purposes. This is the basis of the prosecution. On this machine was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. P. Lorillard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Adams v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Poultry & Egg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. State v. EvjueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Van Dyke v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API