State v. Arnold
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Defendant is the lessee of an oil station in the city of Milwaukee. As a part of the service equipment, defendant maintains two wash-rooms, one for women and the other for men. Two detectives of the Milwaukee police department entered the station on December 19, 1933, and asked permission to use the men’s wash-room. One of the officers found attached to the wall of the wash-room a slot-machine. He inserted ten cents in this slot-machine and received a cartridge containing a rubber article, commonly used for contraceptive purposes. This is the basis of the prosecution. On this machine was a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. P. Lorillard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Adams v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. Northwest Poultry & Egg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State v. EvjueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Van Dyke v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. CorbettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.