Legal Opinion
State v. Evjue
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1948PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
It is considered that attention should first be directed to some matters of pleading and practice in order to keep the record straight. Sec. 355.09, Stats., provides :
“Any objection to a prosecution or the sufficiency of an indictment or information that may be raised by motion to quash, demurrer, plea in abatement, or special plea in bar, shall be so raised before a jury is impaneled or testimony taken, and unless so raised, shall be deemed waived. . . .”
The so-called pleas in bar raise no question except that relating to the validity of sec. 348.412, Stats., on the ground that it abridges…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Briscoe v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. GeaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- State v. CourtneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Denny v. MertzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.